Transparency report

Transparency report

Orbislo launched in 2026. We will publish figures here once there is a full reporting period. Until then there is nothing meaningful to report.

Our stance

The last point is the one that matters most.

The design is described in full on the security page and in the privacy policy. Data that was never collected cannot be demanded.

  • We require valid legal process. A request by email from a government address is not legal process, and it will be refused and counted
  • We read every order narrowly. If it asks for more than it can lawfully compel, we push back before we produce anything
  • We notify the customer unless a court order forbids it, and where a gag applies we challenge it if there is a reasonable basis
  • We do not build capability we are not required to build. There is no interception facility waiting to be switched on
  • We do not sell personal data. There is no version of this business where that is the plan
  • We hold less than people assume, which is the control that survives a bad day in court
A traveller waiting with luggage in an airport departure area
What we hold about a customer is thinner than people expect, which is the strongest privacy control we have.

How to reach us about this

Legal process should be served on legal at orbislo.com.

Customers exercising their own rights should use the app, where access, export and deletion are all self service, or write to privacy at orbislo.com.

Journalists should start at the media centre, which carries the boilerplate, the brand facts and a named press contact.

Questions people actually ask

What would you actually hand over if you were compelled?
What we hold, which is less than people assume. An email address, a purchase history, the device model a profile was installed on, and coarse connection quality events at roughly one kilometre. We do not hold browsing history, message content, page addresses or precise location, so no order can compel them out of us.